>> This example also shows why NARS and PLN are similar on deduction, but >> very different in abduction and induction. > > Yes. One of my biggest practical complaints with NARS is that the induction > and abduction truth value formulas don't make that much sense to me.
Interesting in the context of these statements that my current "justification" for NARS probabilistically justifies induction and abduction but isn't as clear concerning deduction. (I'm working on it...) --Abram Demski ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=114414975-3c8e69 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
