> > PLN needs to make assumptions about node probability in this case; but > NARS > > also makes assumptions, it's just that NARS's assumptions are more deeply > > hidden in the formalism... > > If you means assumptions like "insufficient knowledge and resources", > you are right, but that is not at the same level as assumptions about > the values of node probability.
I mean assumptions like "symmetric treatment of intension and extension", which are technical mathematical assumptions... > > > I guess my previous question was not clear enough: if the only domain > knowledge PLN has is > > > Ben is an author of a book on AGI <tv1> > > This dude is an author of a book on AGI <tv2> > > and > > > Ben is odd <tv1> > > This dude is odd <tv2> > > Will the system derives anything? Yes, via making default assumptions about node probability... ben ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=114414975-3c8e69 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
