2009/6/14 Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk>: > On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 07:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> > On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Charles Walker < >> >> charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Aaron Goldfein<aarongoldf...@gmail.com> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >> If no player has posted a promotion/ demotion policy in the next 3 days, I >> >> vote for coppro. >> > >> > My current posted promotion/demotion policy is that I do not plan to make >> > any illegal promotions or demotions if I can avoid it. -G. >> >> I'll amend that; If elected, I pledge not to let material bribes made to >> myself (or persons I specify) while I hold office (e.g. assets, votes on >> proposals, props, or promises of same) affect whom I promote; I can >> terminate this pledge if I am not elected, or during the next election for >> this office. -G. >> > I call for judgement on the statement "G. made a pledge in the > above-quoted message." > > Arguments: Is "If elected, I pledge" the same as "I pledge that, if > elected" (adjusting for grammar)? Arguably, this attempted pledge wasn't > created because it was an attempt to create a pledge in the future, > rather than agree to one now. > > I'll leave this pledge attempt off the Notary report until it's decided > one way or another by CFJ. > -- I disfavour this case.
-- -Tiger
