Additionally, to this finger-pointing and my finger-pointing, I add my observation that per ais523’s own word, the assignment was not fair to the Arbiter and therefore was a violation of Rule 991. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jun 29, 2017, at 9:18 AM, CuddleBeam <cuddleb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > >2 - I disagree with your conjecture - those CFJ assignments were > >reasonable and made the game flow better > > I agree with that they made the game flow better but I don't see how that > supercedes word of law. Our laws are just a bit junk for these kind of cases > of making the game flow better - but that doesn't remove that e has violated > them. > > I support PSS's moot. (While inconvenient for the flow gameplay, I find what > PSS has exposed to be true.) > > I also Point a Finger at ais523 for an infraction of "interested players have > reasonably equal opportunities to judge". (I wouldn't agree with something as > severe as a Pink Slip though, but I feel like there has been an infraction of > our (unfortunately obtrusive for this case) laws)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
