I vote REMAND on the issue, with the understanding that it should be tried
as it is intended as opposed to through the lens of the medium this game
partakes in.

天火狐

On 29 June 2017 at 13:01, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> If ais523 pledges to judge CFJ 3534 TRUE, I vote REMAND, otherwise I vote
> REMIT.
> ----
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On Jun 29, 2017, at 9:57 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 09:47 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> >> You're misconstruing what e said. E said that eir assignments _did_
> >> give everyone a "reasonably equal" opportunity to judge.  I any case,
> >> I object to the finger pointing (not that objecting does anything). I
> >> further support the intent to enter the judgment into Moot, and do
> >> so.
> >
> > Aris + Cuddlebeam + Publius Scribonius Scholasticus = 3, that's enough.
> > I was going to say "with all these new players, people have forgotten
> > that Moots are broken", but it turns out that we fixed them at some
> > point, so perhaps this will actually work.
> >
> > I initiate the Agoran Decision to determine public confidence in the
> > judgement of CFJ 3534.
> >
> > For this decision, the vote collector is the Arbitor, and the valid
> > options are AFFIRM, REMAND, and REMIT (PRESENT is also a valid vote).
> > Quorum for this decision is 6.
> >
> > A reminder of the typical meanings of each option:
> >
> > AFFIRM: The judgement was broadly correct;
> > REMAND: The judgement should be reconsidered by the original judge to
> > contain more detail or reasoning behind the judgement, or to take into
> > account points not previously considered;
> > REMIT: The judgement was incorrect and should be tried again by a
> > different judge.
> >
> > [A side note: despite having been a player for years, I don't remember
> > ever having initiated an Agoran Decision before. I guess those tend to
> > be confined to particular offices.]
> >
> > --
> > ais523
> > Arbitor
>
>

Reply via email to