I CoE my own most recent proposal pool. It was missing the proposal entitled "Medals of Honour Fix".
-Aris On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:08 PM, ATMunn <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh, okay. I retract the most recent proposal entitled "Medals of Honour Fix" > > > On 11/5/2017 6:56 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: >> >> It went through [1]. I pay ATMunn 2 shinies, and apologize for the >> error. You should probably retract your new one. >> >> -Aris >> >> >> [1] >> https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg30317.html >> >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:40 PM, ATMunn <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I just realized something... >>> On October 30, I made a proposal to fix my Medals of Honour proposal. I >>> was >>> going to CoE this because it's not here but... >>> I tried to find the message, and found it, but apparently something >>> happened >>> AND IT'S NOT IN THE ONLINE MAIL ARCHIVES SO THAT MEANS NOBODY GOT IT >>> >>> So that's fun. >>> >>> I submit the following proposal: >>> >>> Title: "Medals of Honour Fix" >>> AI: 1 >>> Author: ATMunn >>> Co-author(s): >>> >>> If there is a rule entitled "Medals of Honour", and it contains the >>> phrase >>> "In the 7 days of an Agoran month", then amend that rule by replacing >>> that >>> phrase with "In the first 7 days of an Agoran month" >>> >>> On 11/5/2017 4:24 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran >>>> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal >>>> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the >>>> quorum is 6.0 and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is >>>> also a valid vote, as are valid conditional votes). >>>> >>>> ID Author(s) AI Title Pender Pend >>>> fee >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> 7957* G. 1.0 Random Irony G. OP >>>> [1] >>>> 7958* G. 2.0 Succession Planning G. OP >>>> [1] >>>> 7959* Telnaior 3.0 Deregistration Fix Telnaior 1 AP >>>> 7960* V.J. Rada 2.0 Community Chest Repeal II V.J. Rada 2 >>>> sh. >>>> 7961* G. 1.0 Fear less G. 1 AP >>>> >>>> >>>> The proposal pool currently contains the following proposals: >>>> >>>> ID Author(s) AI Title >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> pp1 Alexis 1.7 A Most Ingenious Paradox >>>> >>>> Legend: <ID>* : Proposal is pending. >>>> >>>> [1] Official Proposal, inherently pending >>>> >>>> A proposal may be pended for 1 AP, or for 1/20th the Floating Value >>>> in shines (see the Treasuror's report). >>>> >>>> The full text of the aforementioned proposals is included below. >>>> >>>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >>>> ID: 7957 >>>> Title: Random Irony >>>> Adoption index: 1.0 >>>> Author: G. >>>> Co-authors: >>>> OFFICIAL PROPOSAL >>>> >>>> >>>> Repeal Rule 2505 (Random Choices). >>>> >>>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >>>> ID: 7958 >>>> Title: Succession Planning >>>> Adoption index: 2.0 >>>> Author: G. >>>> Co-authors: >>>> OFFICIAL PROPOSAL >>>> >>>> >>>> Amend Rule 1006 (Offices) by replacing: >>>> >>>> The holder of an elected office CAN resign it by announcement, >>>> causing >>>> it to become vacant. >>>> >>>> with: >>>> >>>> The holder of an elected office CAN resign it by announcement, >>>> causing >>>> it to become vacant. The non-interim holder of an elected office >>>> CAN, >>>> With 3 Support, resign the office while appointing another player to >>>> become the holder of the office, provided that other player is one >>>> of >>>> the Supporters. >>>> >>>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >>>> ID: 7959 >>>> Title: Deregistration Fix >>>> Adoption index: 3.0 >>>> Author: Telnaior >>>> Co-authors: >>>> >>>> >>>> Amend Rule 869 ("How to Join and Leave Agora", power 3) as follows: >>>> Modify the string "If a player has not sent a message to a public >>>> forum >>>> in the >>>> last month, then any player CAN deregister em without objection." >>>> to >>>> "If a player has not sent a message to a public forum in the last >>>> month, >>>> then any player CAN deregister em with 3 Agoran Consent." >>>> >>>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >>>> ID: 7960 >>>> Title: Community Chest Repeal II >>>> Adoption index: 2.0 >>>> Author: V.J. Rada >>>> Co-authors: >>>> >>>> >>>> Repeal rule 2508, "Community Chest" >>>> Amend rules 2510 "Such is Karma" and 2511 "Karmic Balance" in numerical >>>> order by >>>> replacing any instances of the phrases "the Community Chest" and "The >>>> Community Chest" with the word "Agora". >>>> >>>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >>>> ID: 7961 >>>> Title: Fear less >>>> Adoption index: 1.0 >>>> Author: G. >>>> Co-authors: >>>> >>>> >>>> Repeal Rule 2309 (The Propose-O-Matic). >>>> >>>> [It's a bit of a fun thing when the game is slow, but otherwise just >>>> adds some noise, and plenty of us are looking at the past for things >>>> to re-enact without it]. >>>> >>>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >>>> ID: pp1 >>>> Title: A Most Ingenious Paradox >>>> Adoption index: 1.7 >>>> Author: Alexis >>>> Co-authors: >>>> >>>> >>>> Text in square brackets is not a part of this proposal and has no >>>> effect. >>>> >>>> Enact a new power-1 rule entitled "Win by Paradox": >>>> >>>> If a CFJ has been assigned a judgment of PARADOXICAL continuously >>>> for at least 7 days, and e has not done so already in respect of >>>> that CFJ, then that case's initiator CAN, by announcement, win the >>>> game. >>>> >>>> A player who wins in this fashion SHOULD submit a proposal to >>>> prevent the paradox from arising again. >>>> >>>> Amend rule 591 by replacing: >>>> >>>> The valid judgements for an inquiry case are as follows, based on >>>> the truth or falsity of the statement at the time the inquiry case >>>> was initiated (if its truth value changed at that time, then its >>>> initial truth value is used): >>>> >>>> with: >>>> >>>> The valid judgements for an inquiry case are as follows, based on >>>> the facts and legal situation at the time the inquiry case was >>>> initiated, not taking into account any events since that time: >>>> >>>> [This is to prevent changing facts not related to truth or falsity, e.g. >>>> availability of information, from affecting outcomes.] >>>> >>>> and by replacing: >>>> >>>> * DISMISS, appropriate if the statement is malformed, undecidable, >>>> if insufficient information exists to make a judgement with >>>> reasonable effort, or the statement is otherwise not able to be >>>> answered with another valid judgement. >>>> >>>> with: >>>> >>>> * DISMISS, appropriate if the statement is malformed, undecidable, >>>> if insufficient information exists to make a judgement with >>>> reasonable effort, or the statement is otherwise not able to be >>>> answered with another valid judgement. DISMISS is not >>>> appropriate if PARADOXICAL is appropriate. >>>> >>>> and by appending to the end: >>>> >>>> * PARADOXICAL, appropriate if the statement is logically >>>> undecidable as a result of a paradox or or other irresovable >>>> logical situation. PARADOXICAL is not appropriate if IRRELEVANT >>>> is appropriate, nor is it appropriate if the undecidability >>>> arises from the case itself. >>>> >>>> [The reference to IRRELEVANT is to prevent multiple wins from the same >>>> paradox.] >>>> >>>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >>>> >>> >
