I vote as follows:

> ID     Author(s)      AI   Title                        Pender      Pend fee
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 7957*  G.             1.0  Random Irony                 G.          OP [1]

AGAINST, but I appreciate the cosmic joke.

> 7958*  G.             2.0  Succession Planning          G.          OP [1]

FOR. I like the idea, but I’m not convinced of the implementation: in 
particular, is an appointed successor an interim, or a non-interim holder of an 
office? I’m voting for it regardless, since it does solve a known issue; we can 
work out the refinements afterwards.

> 7959*  Telnaior       3.0  Deregistration Fix           Telnaior    1 AP

FOR.

> 7960*  V.J. Rada      2.0  Community Chest Repeal II    V.J. Rada   2 sh.

FOR.

> 7961*  G.             1.0  Fear less                    G.          1 AP

FOR.

-o

Reply via email to