I claim a Blue Ribbon by the way.

I also claim Blue Glitter.


On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 4:44 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discuss...@agoranomic.org> wrote:

>
> On 8/9/2021 7:36 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On 8/9/21 9:17 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
> >> Alright, re-Judging:
> >>
> >> I Judge FALSE.
> >>
> >> Backed by the arguments provided, I have become convinced that it is
> >> possible to try to simultaneously flip a Switch. However, doing so would
> >> attempt to make it an indeterminate value, and by R2126, such attempts
> >> would instead cause the switch to take on its last determinate and
> possible
> >> value if any, or its default otherwise.
> >>
> >> Since it would instead take on its last determinate value, there ain't
> no
> >> flippin' flipping, because attempting to flip an instance of a switch
> to a
> >> value it already has does not flip the switch (R2126).
> >
> >
> > E didn't try to simultaneously flip switches, e tried to simultaneously
> > plan to flip switches, so I don't think that clause applies.
> >
>
> I think it applies in terms of what happens at the beginning of the month?
>   It's the beginning-of-the-month trigger that's doing the "trying to
> simultaneously flip", not my planning action.
>
> This judgement means that two simultaneous plans were laid and that both
> count as being the most recent, so you get an "momentarily indeterminate
> -> back to previous value" thing happening at the beginning of the month.
> Which is slightly different than the interpretation "there was no single
> latest plan, so no temporary indeterminacy happens".
>
>

Reply via email to