I claim a Blue Ribbon by the way. I also claim Blue Glitter.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 4:44 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion < agora-discuss...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On 8/9/2021 7:36 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: > > On 8/9/21 9:17 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote: > >> Alright, re-Judging: > >> > >> I Judge FALSE. > >> > >> Backed by the arguments provided, I have become convinced that it is > >> possible to try to simultaneously flip a Switch. However, doing so would > >> attempt to make it an indeterminate value, and by R2126, such attempts > >> would instead cause the switch to take on its last determinate and > possible > >> value if any, or its default otherwise. > >> > >> Since it would instead take on its last determinate value, there ain't > no > >> flippin' flipping, because attempting to flip an instance of a switch > to a > >> value it already has does not flip the switch (R2126). > > > > > > E didn't try to simultaneously flip switches, e tried to simultaneously > > plan to flip switches, so I don't think that clause applies. > > > > I think it applies in terms of what happens at the beginning of the month? > It's the beginning-of-the-month trigger that's doing the "trying to > simultaneously flip", not my planning action. > > This judgement means that two simultaneous plans were laid and that both > count as being the most recent, so you get an "momentarily indeterminate > -> back to previous value" thing happening at the beginning of the month. > Which is slightly different than the interpretation "there was no single > latest plan, so no temporary indeterminacy happens". > >