On 3/27/23 11:56, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote: > Here are some interesting reports you should go and look at. What did these > offices do? What was in these reports? Some things have changed! > > In response to the Sun 24 Feb 2008 Conductor Report, I declare the ritual > number as 10. > https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg01091.html > > In response to the Mon, 24 May 2010 Power Station Manager Report, I declare > the ritual number as 11. > https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg04617.html > > In response to the Tue, 17 Aug 2010 Ship Computor Report, I declare the > ritual number as 12. > https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg04806.html > > In response to the Tue, 12 Apr 2011 Promotor Report, I declare the ritual > number as 13. > https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg05444.html > > In response to the Mon, 22 Jun 2009 Grand Poobah Report, I declare the > ritual number as 14. > https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg03527.html > > In response to the Mon, 22 Feb 2010 Notary Report, I declare the ritual > number as 15. > https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg04425.html > > In response to the Tue, 14 Jul 2009 LPRS Report, I declare nothing. > https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg03663.html > > In response to > https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg04827.html > I declare the ritual number as 11. > > In response to > https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg04448.html > I declare the ritual number as 12. > > In response to > https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg05368.html > I declare the ritual number as 13. > > In response to > https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg06018.html > I declare the ritual number as 14. > > In response to > https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg06559.html > I declare the ritual number as 15. > > I'm done for now. I'll be back later until someone inevitably > doesn't like this and fixes the timeframes we can report on. > :) It's just 1 point and this is a lot of work to dig up :P
CoE on each of the attempts: the attempt failed. Please do not deny these. If you are going to respond, instead refer them to CFJ 4019, which will have to find whether these worked. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Mad Engineer, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
