I actually find it quite interesting to have partnerships as Shareholders. I'd hate to see that go away due to a rule change.
On 5/13/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BobTHJ wrote: > Being that Primo Corporation is not a partnership, I don't believe it > would exist as a player under this new rule. As CEO, I am gravely > concerned by this language... It assigns rights and obligations to all partners, therefore it's a partnership even if it doesn't call itself one. I will likely have HP2 and SSE withdraw from it, though, to avoid ambiguity.
