On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Taral wrote: > Well, I guess this works as well as the original attempt. However, > it's likely to hit you with 10,000 violations of Rule 1871.
I'm not sure about that. R1871 only says that the *CotC* SHALL NOT do this. However, I think it's more likely that it won't matter, and this will convince Zefram to actually assign judges to those CFJs. Actually, I'm not even sure if either of the deputisations will work. The CotC isn't obligated to assign cases to me (just to someone), and deputisation isn't clear on whether I can deputise with an argument (if not then I'd consider it broken); and changing sitting players to standing, whether or not everyone's sitting, is not explicitly required.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
