On Saturday 17 November 2007 19:54:12 comex wrote: > On Saturday 17 November 2007, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > I call for appeal of Murphy's latest judgement in CFJ 1787, and suggest > > at this point REASSIGN. CotC, please consider the preceding paragraph > > to be my Appellant's arguments. > > I object! > > Repeatedly appealing a judgement because of an unsatisfactory result is > only legal through a loophole and should not be. I suggest that the > appeal panel wait two weeks, then judge AFFIRM, thereby removing the > possibility of appeal from the case. >
The whole *idea* of REMAND is that the judge acted from incorrect information. If the judge does not even make arguments to support his sustained opinion after a REMAND, then the judgement *must* be appealed. This result is not merely unsatisfactory, it's pure *bullshit*.
