On Jan 26, 2008 10:29 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I CFJ on the following statements (requesting linked assignments): > > Where the above referenced decision on amending the Vote Market > agreement able to be validly resolved as of the calling of this CFJ > would Pavitra's vote of OBJECT be valid? > > Where the above referenced decision on amending the Vote Market > agreement able to be validly resolved as of the calling of this CFJ > would pikhq's vote of OBJECT be valid?
Those are questions, not statements. -root
