On Jan 26, 2008 10:42 AM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Saturday 26 January 2008 10:37:07 Ian Kelly wrote: > > On Jan 26, 2008 10:29 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I CFJ on the following statements (requesting linked assignments): > > > > > > Where the above referenced decision on amending the Vote Market > > > agreement able to be validly resolved as of the calling of this CFJ > > > would Pavitra's vote of OBJECT be valid? > > > > > > Where the above referenced decision on amending the Vote Market > > > agreement able to be validly resolved as of the calling of this CFJ > > > would pikhq's vote of OBJECT be valid? > > > > Those are questions, not statements. > > > > -root > > He's probably been doing too much in B Nomic, where you consult on a > question. ;) > > Dangit, that is indeed the case, I formatted those for the wrong nomic.
BobTHJ
