On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Elliott Hird > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You couldn't talk about it, in public or private (that's the >> unenforcable part), and all votes must be sent privately by email to ? >> (I think the notary). > > The Assessor. > >> If you proposed an insane proposal which got no FOR votes, you won. >> >> So if someone proposed an insane proposal to destroy the game, >> _someone_ would have to vote for ... but since nobody can know if >> someone did it already, it might just pass. But if you err on the side >> of AGAINST, then they might win. > > Perhaps we should try Insaner proposals: all of the above, plus the > proposal's title, text, author and AI are secret as well. > > -root >
How about Blind Proposals - The opposite of Insane, Voting is public but the proposal is private.
