On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 14 June 2008 8:38:19 ihope wrote: >> So what is it that you need to do that the rules have the power to >> prevent you from doing, and do not allow you to do? I'm taking out >> scammable paragraphs and replacing them with a sentence or two that >> have the same effect, if not a better one. > > How about making statements to the DF that I haven't taken the time to > carefully evaluate for truthfulness? Or, for that matter, making jokes > to the DF (see CFJ 1849 and > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)? >
I just feel that there's no need to prohibit actions which aren't explicitly disallowed. I don't see how it's scammable and see reasons to allow such actions (see above). avpx
