On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > Perhaps our criterion of illegality should be whether the message > included intent to deceive, not absolute positive belief in the > statement's truth.
I liked a version that included intent to deceive, Zefram didn't care for it so it disappeared from Murphy's draft. Intent to deceive is a good way to cover, say, making true statements but sending them from an "imposter" email account. -Goethe
