On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Ed Murphy wrote: > I think that (a) you're discussing intent to mislead in general, and > (b) Zefram and I objected to what used to be called recklessness wrt > the truth (i.e. publishing a statement without bothering to consider > whether it was true or not). Would you be happy if such recklessness > were defined as another form of intent to mislead?
Yep, that's what I was talking about. > I also see no harm in adding an exemption for any statement for which > IRRELEVANT would be an appropriate judgement on an inquiry case on > that statement. Actually, adding "intent to deceive" would probably protect performance art pieces like dancing, if you add this, you might just make it "an attempt to deceive on a matter relevant to the rules". -Goethe
