On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Reason: I believe that we came to think (via CFJ, or just discussion?)
>> if R2019 "in a timely fashion SHALL" expires before the beginning of a
>> month, the Speaker loses the ability to assign prerogatives
>
> It was by discussion; you called CJFs 1890-1 to resolve the issue but
> at the time the CFJs were called it was impossible for the Speaker to
> assign any prerogatives whatsoever so my judgments ignored the issue
> of what would happen if e could assign Prerogatives but failed to do
> so before the beginning of the month.
>
> As the rule is written now, I could be persuaded that the Speaker CAN
> assign prerogatives at any time, but only for following month and not
> for the current month, or alternatively that assignment is only
> possible during the last 7 days of a month.

Hmm, I wonder how the "upcoming month" part interacts with deputisation
attempts.  Multiple questions here.

-Goethe



Reply via email to