On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:13, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:04, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I note that if BobTHJ had fulfilled eir contract-defined duties on >>> time, ehird would have been able to easily figure this out. >>> >> I note that if I didn't have to spend several hours each day sorting >> out crazy transactions like this I would have plenty of time to >> publish reports for the contracts that I manage. > > Which is an excellent reason to uphold the "specific" precedent and > make such crazy transactions much more difficult. > I'm fine with considering comex's transaction to fail for lack of specification if ehird also agrees.
BobTHJ
