On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:28 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But there's no reason R1728 shouldn't support > with-support-without-objection generally. (Goethe, was it intended > to?) > > Proposal: Allow multiple methods (AI=2) > Amend Rule 1728 by replacing "method" in item b) with "methods."
That's probably not sufficient. I suggest adding "Without N Objections and With M Support" as a fourth method, adjusting the parts that refer to N to also refer to M, and adding a new satisfaction clause to R2124. -root
