On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:31, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Unless you can give me a reasonable argument for this to be accepted >> I'm treating it as >> ineffective for not being clearly specified enough because if I allow >> unrestricted >> conditionals that would allow people to condition on turing complete >> or undecidable >> things. > > Fallacy of the excluded middle. You're well within your rights to > allow only reasonable conditionals. > > Anyway, unless y'all are revising history Yet Again (or have both > failed to record some recent and relevant changes), each of the trios > (except the "I think this fails" ones) should evaluate as follows: > > 1) RBoA-withdraw the Credit for 50 chits > 2) PBA-deposit the Credit for the stated number of coins > 3) RBoA-deposit 10 coins for 50 chits > > I will process this if ehird wishes to do so, otherwise I am considering this entire transaction to fail (now that we are back in sync it matters not to me which way this one goes).
BobTHJ
