Goethe wrote:
> R101 says you can publish text. It doesn't say anything about what the
> legal effect of doing so can or can't be. For example, you can publish
> all the text of a Proposal Distribution, but it's not a Proposal
> Distribution unless you're the Promotor. Similarly, R101 says you can
> publish the contents of an NoV, that doesn't mean it is one. Therefore
> you're R101/R478 argument isn't particularly meaningful.
This seems like another facet of ISIDTID. Which, come to think of it,
should really be addressed explicitly by Rule 478, e.g.
A public message claiming that one performs a game-defined action
is not generally effective, but must be specifically enabled, e.g.
by a rule stating that one CAN perform it by announcement.
A public message claiming to be a game-defined entity (e.g. a
distribution of proposals) is not generally that entity, but must
match the circumstances defined for that entity (e.g. being sent
by the Promotor).
