On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 15:22 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote: >> Someone attempts to inactivate you. >> (A) Start participating >> (B) Let it happen >> (C) Just object without justification for eternity, inflating quorum. >>> C > > Maybe we should instead make quorum depend on the number of people who > actually voted last time round (like B used to), rather than messing > with inactivation?
Maybe we should be permitted to make people inactive by support (rather than w/o objection) if they have not voted for N months or M proposals. -G.
