On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Roger Hicks wrote: > What would make far more sense if you ask me is to eliminate the > concept of report timeframe from salary. There is no need to have two > different governing mechanisms (report timeframe and II) for paying > salaries when one would suffice. Massage the II of a few offices, if > needed increase the II upper range, and then pay weekly salary for all > offices based on that II.
With finer granularity and greater turnover of cards, there's no harm in giving a (low for lower priority) weekly salary for every office. To counteract that, instead of tying "didn't perform duties" to salary, also adjust the granularity of the Rest punishment for failure to perform. -G.
