On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:13, Kerim Aydin<[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Roger Hicks wrote: >> What would make far more sense if you ask me is to eliminate the >> concept of report timeframe from salary. There is no need to have two >> different governing mechanisms (report timeframe and II) for paying >> salaries when one would suffice. Massage the II of a few offices, if >> needed increase the II upper range, and then pay weekly salary for all >> offices based on that II. > > With finer granularity and greater turnover of cards, there's no harm > in giving a (low for lower priority) weekly salary for every office. > > To counteract that, instead of tying "didn't perform duties" to salary, > also adjust the granularity of the Rest punishment for failure to perform. > Ooo....tying crime-class to office II is a great idea.
BobTHJ
