On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 18:01, comex<com...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Roger Hicks<pidge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 17:50, comex<com...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 7:20 PM, <pidge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> NOTE: Actions taken in this message are on behalf of Pavitra as permitted
>>>> by contract, and may in turn be on behalf of other recordkeepors and/or
>>>> officeholders.
>>>>
>>>> {
>>>> Pavitra is dealt the following card(s) from the deck of Justice, but each
>>>> such draw is only valid if e is still owed a draw from this deck : Drop
>>>> Your Weapon
>>>> }
>>>> Reason: Self-initiated draw(s)
>>>
>>> CoE: Pavitra cannot create a card in eir possession because e is not
>>> the Insulator.
>>>
>> Denied. E acted on my behalf via the terms of the BJS contract.
>
> E may be authorized to do so, but the message does not specify that e
> is acting on behalf of anyone.
>
As quoted from every message sent from my site:
NOTE: Actions taken in this message are on behalf of Pavitra as =
permitted by contract, and may in turn be on behalf of other =
recordkeepors and/or officeholders.
BobTHJ
