On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, comex wrote: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> And yes I meant to use the "G. is a player" precedent for this; a kibitzer >> can still be an anti-scammer, c. :) :) > > Nice. Did you predict he would do something like that? >
Can't claim to have predicted specifics; thought e might be trying to play with ambiguity between dependent action methods/intents. -G.
