On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 09:51 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote: > ais523 wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 16:30 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > >> I vote FOR on the decision on whether to adopt proposal 6514. > > > > Thus forcing me to attempt to use a scam before it's been judged whether > > it worked or not (Murphy could resolve the proposal as ADOPTED right > > now, AFAICT), which is always a risky proposition. This message is > > designed to not increase the ambiguity any more than is necessary to > > maintain the mousetrap if it does indeed exist. > > Wasn't it quorate? I'll let Murphy CoE on this one, but I just want to ask.
AFAICT, it wasn't quorate at the end of the voting period (with 4 voters); with Pavitra's and Tiger's votes, it has 6 voters which I think is quorum atm. So the voting period was doubled; and now the Assessor can cut it short by announcement, so I had to try to cut it short first myself, with the votes in a situation favourable to me. (Of course, none of this is relevant if the mousetrap doesn't actually exist.) -- ais523
