comex wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:40 AM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> Thus forcing me to attempt to use a scam before it's been j > > remind me to vote on such proposals in the future to avoid these > quorum games. though I probably would have voted AGAINST, as it's not > nice to counter by proposal the scam of someone who spends so much > time worrying about his scams being countered by proposal.
I proposed it before the scam, just to cut off any obligations I might be racking up from its original round-robin-contestmaster intent. Using it to counter the scam was just a nice bonus (and presumably why ais523 tried to destroy all my Distrib-u-Matics).
