On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> Ultimately, what we're dealing with is, if a person does take an
> absolute dictatorship, and e makes too many changes, then players who
> are strongly pro-democratic may leave, and having a dictatorship
> with no players is rather hollow.  So ultimately it's very nomic, as
> you're just trying to make sure players don't exercise their ultimate
> nomic-right to stop playing.  And in Agora, for better or worse, that
> means fairly conservative play; if you want something else, B is right
> next door, and as is currently very apparent they don't participate in
> things too much like Agora :).

This. Remember that this is really Agora II...

-- 
Taral <tar...@gmail.com>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
    -- Unknown

Reply via email to