On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > So what I'm saying is: if you allow those administrative conveniences > to create legal fictions of individual cast ballots
So, you're saying, the situation is as if I said "For each decision in the list of decisions which a reasonable person would think currently exist, (and I do hereby quasi-incorporate that list), I vote FOR on it"... Have we ever had a CFJ about a conditional or mass action where the recordkeepors were mistaken about the gamestate, so that everyone thought it had effect X, but platonically it would have effect Y?
