ais523 wrote: > --- On Tue, 24/8/10, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: >> In this case, the entity with the name "The Robot" will be >> coppro *at the time of the enaction of the rule*. Also: >> >> A document referring to an entity by name refers to the >> entity that had that name when the document first came to include >> that reference, even if the entity's name has since changed. > > Is "the document" the rule or proposal? Or both?
The first paragraph of R1586 re-defines "documents" as "rules" for the purpose of R1586, though I don't think it blocks the scam.
