On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 17:20, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Aaron Goldfein <aarongoldf...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> even publish. It's clearly mpossible for both of these things to be >> true. Therefore, e MUST have known that at least one of these NoVs >> contained incorrect information. > > Nonsense, failing to know that does NOT violate the rule in question!
Yes, but if e did know that it was impossible for both NoVs to contain correct information, then e HAS violated the rule in question. And because it was so obvious, e probably did know that.
