On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > I contest this. My opinion on CFJ 2908 strongly implies that I don't > believe I was a player at the time it was purportedly assigned to me. > This assignment was purportedly made after I deregistered and before > the self-ratification of the document I published purporting to be a > Registrar's report. I don't believe the ratification retroactively > made the assignment to me possible, due to the wording of R1551.
Oh, that makes more sense. However, I disagree with you: "the current judge of CFJ 2908" is part of the gamestate; it can be ratified to be you irrespective of whether Murphy actually succeeded in assigning it to you when e purported to.
