On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, omd wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > Yeah, I stared at this for a while when cutting and pasting just now and > > wondered why it was this way but just left it. How's this: > > > > If a decision to adopt a proposal does not result in an outcome of > > ADOPTED, it does not take effect, rules to the contrary > > notwithstanding. > > I see that as a little ambiguous about what happens if no decision > exists; I'd prefer "no decision to adopt a proposal results in"
Hows: "If there is no Agoran Decision to adopt a particular proposal that has an outcome of ADOPTED, that proposal CANNOT take effect, rules to the contrary notwithstanding."