On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, omd wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > Yeah, I stared at this for a while when cutting and pasting just now and
> > wondered why it was this way but just left it. How's this:
> >
> > If a decision to adopt a proposal does not result in an outcome of
> > ADOPTED, it does not take effect, rules to the contrary
> > notwithstanding.
>
> I see that as a little ambiguous about what happens if no decision
> exists; I'd prefer "no decision to adopt a proposal results in"
Hows:
"If there is no Agoran Decision to adopt a particular proposal that
has an outcome of ADOPTED, that proposal CANNOT take effect, rules
to the contrary notwithstanding."
