> Turiski, > > Your email seems to be the one with funky wrapping; Gondilier's second > message looks fine to me. I'm not entirely sure how my wrapping works. I fiddled with some settings; is it better now?
> (Specifying a Boolean logical OR in the original message would have > guaranteed failure, which I'm guessing wasn't the intent). Right, but it could have said "xor" or the like. Further, I don't believe "or" is ruleset-defined, so it should have the common language meaning, which is exclusive, but I think there is history to suggest that ENDORSE or AGAINST means what Tanner intended. (I could be completely wrong about this) The fact that he explicitly stated "perl-style" seems to suggest some degree of "please look at this carefully," and a careful look found this somewhat bizarre feature of endorsement. -Turiski
