On 07/30/2011 09:10 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: > On 31 July 2011 02:55, Pavitra <celestialcognit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> It seems like the obvious place to avert that would be while drafting >> the bank charter. > > Later amendments, ulterior motives, ... > >> What cap would you suggest? I feel that anything lower than 6 would >> block legitimate applications, but that anything higher than 3 would >> enable abusive ones. > > What if Regular promises could require players to do it up to three, > and High-Risk promises could require them to do it up to six?
How do you define those classes in such a way that a Regular promise can't become High-Risk by "later amendments"?
