Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SHALL NOT violate a promise

[Elliott Hird]

On 31 July 2011 03:19, Pavitra <celestialcognit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How do you define those classes in such a way that a Regular promise
> can't become High-Risk by "later amendments"?

Agoran Consent, or somesuch, to High-Riskify a promise.