On 08/01/2011 11:46 AM, ais523 wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 11:21 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
>> [Preamble: contracts used to be able to impose SHALL requirements. I
>> believe the following will in effect enable the same for Promises,
>> without most of the problems that the old system had.]
>>
>> I submit the following proposal, "SHALL Promises", AI=1:
>> {
>> Create a rule with the title "Naughtiness" and the following text:
>> A person CAN taunt the police by announcement specifying an
>> integer from 1 to 14 inclusive. Doing so is the Class-N Crime
>> of Naughtiness, where N is the specified integer.
>> }
>
> I seem to remember adding a similar rule in relation to Rests, for
> similar reasons. However, if you want to put a limit on it, you also
> need to rate-limit the action, to prevent people being forced to spam
> Taunts.
As with high-Class infractions, high-rate infractions are potentially
useful for some legitimate applications, and therefore should be
prevented contract-side.
