On 11 August 2011 14:57, Jonatan Kilhamn <jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11 August 2011 00:09, Elliott Hird <penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> Agora cannot play BlogNomic without some construct in the rules >> allowing it to; the only affect this will have is to spam the lists. >> > Well, obviously the game of agora, now an entity capable of taking > action within itself, couldn't really do such a thing. What is my duty > though, is to arrange for there to be a player named Agora in > BlogNomic that acts out the will of the Agoran community. Mostly > because this is the only possible way to enact my rules-imposed duty > as ambassador. To start with, I intend to play the game on behalf of > Agora, seeing as I was elected Ambassador. If this raises any > discussion about how Agora should act in BlogNomic, we'll have to come > up with some mechanism for deciding what actions I, on behalf of > Agora, should take.
I believe that I proposed allowing players to act on Agora's behalf with Agoran Consent, but I'm not sure what happened to that. This would be useful for you to get Agora to join BlogNomic, but it would hardly be easy to play BlogNomic waiting for Agoran Consent for every single action. -- Charles Walker
