On 11 August 2011 16:10, Jonatan Kilhamn <jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11 August 2011 17:03, Charles Walker <charles.w.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 11 August 2011 15:42, Jonatan Kilhamn <jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I don't see why it can't be the mission of the Ambassador to act in >>> Agora's best interest. That's pretty much what an ambassador used to >>> be about: the guy who was entrusted to hang out in other countries and >>> know what the people back home would want him to say. >>> >>> /Tiger >>> >> >> In that case we would need a rule allowing the Ambassador to act on >> Agora's behalf in other nomics. At the moment there simply isn't a >> mechanism which allows it to act at all. >> > So this: > > When the office of Ambassador first becomes filled, the holder > SHALL as soon as possible attempt to cause Agora to become a > player of BlogNomic. > > is kind of pointless? It allows for me to cause Agora to become a > player, rather than ruling that Agora should become a player, so this > far it's explicitly me on behalf of it. But yeah, there's nothing at > all about Agora taking actions elsewhere, now that it is a player > there. > > /Tiger >
I suppose this might depend on what BlogNomic considers Agora being a player of it to consist of. In Agora, legal (second-class) persons have to meet certain criteria and can only act as defined by the Rules. Does BlogNomic allow legal persons to play, or have certain restrictions in place? -- Charles Walker
