On 11/06/2011 03:19 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 15:44, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 13:40 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> With 2 Support I do so. I announce the start of Delve 4 with these (same)
>>> Rules
>>> selected:
>>> Rule 2335 (Judge Points)
>>> Rule 2205 (Judicial Arguments and Evidence)
>>> Rule 2338 (Cashing Promises)
>>
>> I haven't really thought of any good Delves, so this will have to do.
>> (The following CFJ is intended as a Delve.)
>>
>> (inquiry) CFJ: ais523 violated a SHOULD requirement in rule 2205 by
>> submitting this CFJ.
>>
>> Evidence: What should be the arguments are labelled as evidence, and
>> vice versa.
>>
>> Arguments: The above evidence.
>
> The actions in this post constitute a Delve.
>
> I create a Promise with the following text, and then cash it: {{I cash
> this Promise. This Promise is not destroyed by being cashed.}}
>
> I CFJ {Agora is stuck in an infinite loop.}
Gratuitous: The most reasonable interpretation seems to me that scshunt
cashed the promise an infinite number of times simultaneously, and did
not cash it during any subsequent instant.
Pavitra
