On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:13 AM, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:04 PM, John Smith <spamba...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> CfJ, inquiry: >> "The Executor of the message quoted in the evidence cannot be determined >> with reasonable effort except by judicial declaration" > > Gratuitous: IRRELEVANT, as "Mister Snuggles" has never attempted to > support any intents, and the identity of the Executor does not > otherwise decide anything that could be ratified without an > accompanying declaration (which cannot be included in a judicial > declaration) that the message's sender is a first-class person. :>
do you want me to make it relevant? mister snuggles
