On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Mister Snuggles <mr.snu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:13 AM, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:04 PM, John Smith <spamba...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> CfJ, inquiry: >>> "The Executor of the message quoted in the evidence cannot be determined >>> with reasonable effort except by judicial declaration" >> >> Gratuitous: IRRELEVANT, as "Mister Snuggles" has never attempted to >> support any intents, and the identity of the Executor does not >> otherwise decide anything that could be ratified without an >> accompanying declaration (which cannot be included in a judicial >> declaration) that the message's sender is a first-class person. :> > > do you want me to make it relevant?
i wouldn't dream of imposing.
