On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:19 PM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Arguments: The "usual CFJ", despite being established in game custom,
> doesn't have a standard phrasing, although there are some common ones.
> ("I am a player" or "Phlogistique is a player" are two plausible
> wordings.) I'd say that the meaning of the statement of the CFJ is
> unambiguous, but the exact statement of the phrasing is ambiguous. Does
> that matter?

I would have thought that the specific wording of the CFJ created by
my message would be "Also, the usual CFJ."

(Not sure if and how that relates to your point.)

-- 
Noé Rubinstein

Reply via email to