On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > These days, "AGAINT" is treated the same as any other Rule 754 (1) typo > (see Judge Zefram's arguments in CFJ 1885). I thought we'd decided > otherwise, but apparently I remembered wrong (or at least it's only > ambiguous if the poster says "ha ha, this is ambiguous!" or something > along those lines).
I'm surprised as well; you've treated "AGAINT" as ambiguous several times since, and its being ambiguous was referred to in CFJ 2793. I think by this point game custom has progressed so that it actually is ambiguous (since there is an R754 "ambiguity in meaning").
