On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 23:52 -0700, omd wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > >> If the rules of the nomic do not provide such a forum in a manner > >> reasonably accessible without undue effort, it is IMPOSSIBLE for the > >> ambassador to inform the nomic - or at least not reasonably possible. > > I argue that it is reasonably possible for the Ambassador to give the > players involved a reasonable (that word again) opportunity to see the > information - by sending me two rubles, then informing me and the > other player directly. After all, if it were some other type of > obligation, such as making up lost Vote Points, we wouldn't excuse > someone just because satisfying the obligation would require > interacting with other players.
Requiring me to perform an arbitrary action of your choice is unreasonable. Also, I have no guarantee that you actually /would/ tell me the required information if I sent you the rubles: there's no cause-and-effect chain here. (I note that it's impossible to word a promise in such a way that I could determine the information by sending you rubles; some action from you is required no matter what, and you could default, so it's completely impossible for me to perform the required actions by myself.) -- ais523