On Wed, 10 Apr 2013, Sean Hunt wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > I am personally with Wes on this in that we need a clean sweep of personhood > > (raise the personhood definition security to 3 in rule 2150, state > > right out "only first-class persons can be players", then delete all > > reference to classes of players). > > > > I think, quite frankly, that all this personhood crap has been one of > > the drags on the game as it is overly complex to no purpose, and getting > > rid of it, rather than re-complicating it, would be better for activity. > > > > -G. > > It is not a critical component of my proposal that Titles be persons; > it could be rewritten (before or after adoption) to instead just grant > an increased voting limit based on holding a Title. (i.e. holding a > Title gives you +2 VVLOP)
Sounds good; barring any minor bugs I haven't had a chance to delve for, the general idea of the gameplay, outside of the personhood complications, looks good. -G.
