On 27/06/2013 8:43 PM, Steven Gardner wrote:
On 28 June 2013 10:36, Fool <fool1...@gmail.com
<mailto:fool1...@gmail.com>> wrote:
In this case, the effect was your forfeiture (or requirement to
forfeit). It was based on events that occurred prior, but the effect
was not retroactive.
I disagree. R345 describes a sequence of actions that lead to
forfeiture. To avoid retroactive application, the entire sequence of
events has to begin after R345 takes effect.
Steve
Well, we've been doing that right from the start. With points rather
than forfeiture, but same idea. It was explicitly ruled that this did
not violate R108. (This might also have been the first CFJ in Agora itself.)
-Dan